ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Level of Adherence to Organic Food Consumption and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable diets and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The available literature reports inconclusive findings regarding the frequency of organic food consumption and cancer incidence. This systematic review evaluated the effect of the frequency of organic food consumption on overall and site-specific cancer risk. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase), the gray literature, and the reference lists of the included reports were searched for eligible studies. Study screening, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent examiners. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model were utilized to synthesize the available data from the included studies. There was no difference between the two interventions regarding overall cancer (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.78-1.12), breast cancer (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26), colorectal cancer (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.10), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risks (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.17-2.94). The findings suggest that the overall and site-specific cancer risk are not associated with the frequency of consumption of organic foods. Further research is necessary to provide more evidence for the role of organic food consumption on the incidence of cancer using homogeneous methodologies to define the frequency of organic food consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.