ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Tunisian Pediatricians' Attitudes and Practices Toward COVID-19 Immunization and Other Vaccines.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatricians are among the most trusted sources of vaccine information for parents. We aimed, in this study, to describe the attitudes and practices of Tunisian pediatricians regarding non-National Immunization Schedule (NIS) vaccines, specifically the COVID-19 vaccination for children, and to identify factors associated with their willingness to recommend it. We conducted a national cross-sectional study among Tunisian pediatricians between July and October 2023 using a standardized questionnaire administered face-to-face. We calculated prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) using multivariable logistic regression. Of 330 contacted pediatricians, 192 (58.2%) responded (mean age: 50.9 ± 12.9 years). The majority (89.1%, 95% CI: [84.6-93.5]) said that they recommend other vaccines that are not part of the NIS and 40.6% [33.7-47.6] declared their willingness to recommend the COVID-19 vaccination for children. The odds of pediatricians willing to recommend the COVID-19 vaccination for children were higher among those who believed that this vaccine would reduce school absenteeism (aOR = 2.3 [1.1-5.1]) and among those who have great confidence in the Ministry of Health's recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 6.1 [2.2-16.9]). More than half of the pediatricians in Tunisia recommend other vaccines that are not part of the NIS but show hesitancy toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Thus, involving pediatricians in the decision-making process for childhood vaccination strategies is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.