Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003431›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Mental and Physical Well-Being of Partners of People Living with Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review.

Toby R O Newton-John, Shari Cave, Debbie J Bean

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toby R O Newton-JohnGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-4985
Shari CaveDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Health New Zealand Waitematā, Auckland 0620, New Zealand.
Debbie J BeanCentre for Person Centred Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0620, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0606-8749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review aims to explore the mental and physical well-being of partners of individuals living with chronic pain. Chronic pain not only affects those who suffer from it, but also significantly impacts the lives of their partners; however, the impacts on partners are not well recognised, despite extensive evidence indicating that their quality of life can be equally affected. This review synthesises current literature to identify the psychological and physical challenges faced by these partners, including increased stress, anxiety, depression, and the potential for developing chronic health conditions themselves. A search of Medline for "chronic pain" and "partner/spouse" from January 1990 to the present was performed, and relevant articles were selected for review. The main findings were that while partners often experience a range of negative physical and psychosocial impacts on their quality of life, dyadic coping strategies can mitigate these effects. This review underscores the importance of future research to develop targeted interventions that address the unique needs of this population, promoting better health outcomes and fostering resilience in the face of chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMental HealthQuality of LifeSpousesAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyHumansStress, Psychologicalchronic paincopingpartnerquality of lifespouse

Identifiers

PMID40003431
PMCPMC11855541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.