ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
A Trans and Queer Discursive Approach to Gender Diversity and Misgendering in the Transgender and Gender Diverse Population: Queering a Study for ICD-11.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indian psychiatrist at the crossroads of transgender care: Gatekeeper, advocate, or redundant authority?Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Producing knowledge about transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals is a core public health strategy challenge. Yet several systemic limitations arise, notably the exclusion or exploitation of TGD individuals by research systems reproducing systemic discrimination by embedding social norms as self-evident facts of nature. This is particularly worrying in biomedical research, and contributes to the invisibilization of participants' gender diversity. This trans research illustrates methodological challenges through queering an earlier study by focusing on misgendering as a discursive element. We based our work on discursive materials reported by TGD participants in an ICD-11 study on gender incongruence. We used network analyses to illustrate potential differences between declared gender identity and discourse practices. Our results highlight a gap between declared gender identity and discourse practices, bringing the number of non-binary participants in the sample from 15 (20.8%) to 36 (50.0%). Moreover, misgendering and the use of derogatory terms are more common toward gender-diverse individuals. Sexual orientation shows a similar trend. This study reveals the reproduction of social norms within research processes and medical knowledge, as well as how, from an individual perspective, their non-compliance seems to be a key factor in TGD individuals' experience. By providing this simple methodological example, we hope to promote better integration of gender and its various dimensions into biomedical and public health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.