ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Case Study of a Broken Instrument in a Primary Tooth and Literature Review.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Dental Caries Status of New Pediatric Patients in Tertiary Dental Institutions in 2013, 2018, and 2023.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoot canal treatment is an important element of dental treatment, and broken instruments are one cause of endodontic treatment failure. Broken instruments are rarely reported in primary teeth because of their inherently wider and relatively straighter root canals. We describe a case of a patient with a broken instrument in a primary tooth and reviewed the literature across three databases. CASE PRESENTATION: A boy aged 7 years and 2 months was referred to our hospital because of pain persisting despite multiple dental treatments. Radiographic examination revealed a broken instrument in the maxillary right primary second molar. The patient experienced dental fear, so the treatment proceeded with the use of behavioral management and nitrous oxide, after which his pain disappeared. At the age of 9 years and 2 months, eruption of the successive permanent teeth was confirmed, and no pathological findings were observed except enamel hypoplasia. We undertook a literature review across three databases and found only two articles about broken instruments in primary teeth, neither of which described the eruption of the permanent teeth. All three cases involved primary molars.
conclusionsWe removed a broken instrument from the root of a primary molar and performed root canal treatment, resulting in a good outcome for the primary molar until it was replaced with successive permanent teeth. Although rare, broken instruments in the roots of primary molars do occur, and care should be taken during root canal treatment of primary molars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.