Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003198›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Tradeoffs Between Richness and Bias of Augmented Data in Long-Tail Recognition.

Wei Dai, Yanbiao Ma, Jiayi Chen, Xiaohua Chen, Shuo Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei DaiSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7023-3966
Yanbiao MaSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8472-1475
Jiayi ChenSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0009-0004-1718-5600
Xiaohua ChenDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100190, China.
Shuo LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No.2023M742738China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No.GZC20232033National Natural Science Foundation of China No.62406231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In long-tail scenarios, models have a very high demand for high-quality data. Information augmentation, as an important class of data-centric methods, has been proposed to improve model performance by expanding the richness and quantity of samples in tail classes. However, the underlying mechanisms behind the effectiveness of information augmentation methods remain underexplored. This has led to reliance on empirical and intricate fine-tuning in the use of information augmentation for long-tail recognition tasks. In this work, we simultaneously consider the richness gain and distribution shift introduced by information augmentation methods and propose effective information gain (EIG) to explore the mechanisms behind the effectiveness of these methods. We find that when the value of the effective information gain appropriately balances the richness gain and distribution shift, the performance of information augmentation methods is fully realized. Comprehensive experiments on long-tail benchmark datasets CIFAR-10-LT, CIFAR-100-LT, and ImageNet-LT demonstrate that using effective information gain to filter augmented data can further enhance model performance without any modifications to the model's architecture. Therefore, in addition to proposing new model architectures, data-centric approaches also hold significant potential in the field of long-tail recognition.

Indexed as

data-centric AIimage recognitionlong-tail distributionrepresentational learning

Identifiers

PMID40003198
PMCPMC11854239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.