Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003197›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Adaptive Trust Evaluation Model Based on Entropy Weight Method for Sensing Terminal Process.

Tao Li, Yanyi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tao LiSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-9776
Yanyi ZhangSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5452-3776

Funding

National Science Foundation no.61601113The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities no. 2242022k30007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote sensing (RS) has been widely used for data acquisition, monitoring, control, and intelligent decision-making. However, most of them are unattended and easily become the target of attack, which means there are still some risks in the sensing terminal processes. Therefore, trust evaluation of the processes associated with the sensing terminal is necessary. The existing trust evaluation model based on the sensing terminal process has some defects, such as low performance, low precision, and difficulty in effectively identifying malicious processes in the sensing terminal. In this paper, an adaptive trust evaluation model based on the entropy weight method is proposed to detect the sensing terminal process (PB-ATEM). By establishing two kinds of trust values, the direct trust value and the reciprocal trust value, we can comprehensively judge whether the process is trustworthy. For the direct trust value, we can dynamically capture the auto-correlation value of processes and establish a dynamic reward and punishment function to improve the response to malicious processes. For reciprocal trust values, k-means cluster analysis is used to classify processes, and the optimal entropy weight method is proposed to calculate the direct trust weight and reciprocal trust weight of each process more accurately, which accelerates the exposure of malicious processes. Finally, these two trust values are weighted to obtain the integrated trust value. The simulation results show that PB-ATEM can respond quickly to malicious processes. Compared with the existing trust evaluation models, it has higher detection accuracy and better ability to identify malicious processes.

Indexed as

auto-correlationentropy weight methodk-means cluster analysisprocess securitytrust evaluationtrust value

Identifiers

PMID40003197
PMCPMC11854710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.