ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty of Reported Behavior Dynamics and Its Relationship to Socio-Political Ideologies and Affiliation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceived Complexity as Normalized, Integrated, Localized Shannon Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transfer learning based deep architecture for lung cancer classification using CT image with pattern and entropy based feature set.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inferring Cinematic Aesthetic Biases from the Statistics of Early Movies.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complexity is one of the most important variables in how the brain performs decision making based on esthetic values. Multiple definitions of perceptual complexity have been proposed, with one of the most fruitful being the Normalized Shannon Entropy one. However, the Normalized Shannon Entropy definition has theoretical gaps that we address in this article. Focusing on visual perception, we first address whether normalization fully corrects for the effects of measurement resolution on entropy. The answer is negative, but the remaining effects are minor, and we propose alternate definitions of complexity, correcting this problem. Related to resolution, we discuss the ideal spatial range in the computation of spatial complexity. The results show that this range must be small but not too small. Furthermore, it is suggested by the analysis of this range that perceptual spatial complexity is based solely on translational isometry. Finally, we study how the complexities of distinct visual variables interact. We argue that the complexities of the variables of interest to the brain's visual system may not interact linearly because of interclass correlation. But the interaction would be linear if the brain weighed complexities as in Kempthorne's λ-Bayes-based compromise problem. We finish by listing several experimental tests of these theoretical ideas on complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.