Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003163›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.

Norberto M Grzywacz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Norberto M GrzywaczDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4615-1560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complexity is one of the most important variables in how the brain performs decision making based on esthetic values. Multiple definitions of perceptual complexity have been proposed, with one of the most fruitful being the Normalized Shannon Entropy one. However, the Normalized Shannon Entropy definition has theoretical gaps that we address in this article. Focusing on visual perception, we first address whether normalization fully corrects for the effects of measurement resolution on entropy. The answer is negative, but the remaining effects are minor, and we propose alternate definitions of complexity, correcting this problem. Related to resolution, we discuss the ideal spatial range in the computation of spatial complexity. The results show that this range must be small but not too small. Furthermore, it is suggested by the analysis of this range that perceptual spatial complexity is based solely on translational isometry. Finally, we study how the complexities of distinct visual variables interact. We argue that the complexities of the variables of interest to the brain's visual system may not interact linearly because of interclass correlation. But the interaction would be linear if the brain weighed complexities as in Kempthorne's λ-Bayes-based compromise problem. We finish by listing several experimental tests of these theoretical ideas on complexity.

Indexed as

decision makingesthetic valuesperceptual complexityShannon Entropyspatial rangespatial resolutiontranslational isometry

Identifiers

PMID40003163
PMCPMC11854106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.