ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
PRG4CNN: A Probabilistic Model Checking-Driven Robustness Guarantee Framework for CNNs.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an important kind of DNN (deep neural network), CNN (convolutional neural network) has made remarkable progress and been widely used in the vision and decision-making of autonomous robots. Nonetheless, in many scenarios, even a minor perturbation in input for CNNs may lead to serious errors, which means CNNs lack robustness. Formal verification is an effective method to guarantee the robustness of CNNs. Existing works predominantly concentrate on local robustness verification, which requires considerable time and space. Probabilistic robustness quantifies the robustness of CNNs, which is a practical mode of potential measurement. The state-of-the-art of probabilistic robustness verification is a test-driven approach, which is used to manually decide whether a DNN satisfies the probabilistic robustness and does not involve robustness repair. Robustness repair can improve the robustness of CNNs further. To address this issue, we propose a probabilistic model checking-driven robustness guarantee framework for CNNs, i.e., PRG4CNN. This is the first automated and complete framework for guaranteeing the probabilistic robustness of CNNs. It comprises four steps, as follows: (1) modeling a CNN as an MDP (Markov decision processes) by model learning, (2) specifying the probabilistic robustness of the CNN via the PCTL (Probabilistic Computational Tree Logic) formula, (3) verifying the probabilistic robustness with a probabilistic model checker, and (4) probabilistic robustness repair by counterexample-guided sensitivity analysis, if probabilistic robustness does not hold on the CNN. We here conduct experiments on various scales of CNNs trained on the handwriting dataset MNIST, and demonstrate the effectiveness of PRG4CNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.