Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003153›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning Predictors for Min-Entropy Estimation.

Javier Blanco-Romero, Vicente Lorenzo, Florina Almenares Mendoza, Daniel Díaz-Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier Blanco-RomeroDepartment of Telematic Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-0635-953X
Vicente LorenzoDepartment of Telematic Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-6095
Florina Almenares MendozaDepartment of Telematic Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5232-2031
Daniel Díaz-SánchezDepartment of Telematic Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, 28911 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3323-6453

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Ciberseguridad 2023/00623/001Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2020-113795RB-C32Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades TED2021-130369B-C32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the application of machine learning predictors for the estimation of min-entropy in random number generators (RNGs), a key component in cryptographic applications where accurate entropy assessment is essential for cybersecurity. Our research indicates that these predictors, and indeed any predictor that leverages sequence correlations, primarily estimate average min-entropy, a metric not extensively studied in this context. We explore the relationship between average min-entropy and the traditional min-entropy, focusing on their dependence on the number of target bits being predicted. Using data from generalized binary autoregressive models, a subset of Markov processes, we demonstrate that machine learning models (including a hybrid of convolutional and recurrent long short-term memory layers and the transformer-based GPT-2 model) outperform traditional NIST SP 800-90B predictors in certain scenarios. Our findings underscore the importance of considering the number of target bits in min-entropy assessment for RNGs and highlight the potential of machine learning approaches in enhancing entropy estimation techniques for improved cryptographic security.

Indexed as

autoregressive processesgeneralized binary autoregressive modelsmachine learning predictorsmin-entropy estimationrandom number generators

Identifiers

PMID40003153
PMCPMC11854237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.