Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003151›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Protocells Either Synchronize or Starve.

Marco Villani, Roberto Serra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco VillaniDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, Modena and Reggio Emilia University, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-5470
Roberto SerraDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, Modena and Reggio Emilia University, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-5106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two different processes take place in self-reproducing protocells, i.e., (i) cell reproduction by fission and (ii) duplication of the genetic material. One major problem is indeed that of assuring that the two processes take place at the same pace, i.e., that they synchronize, which is a necessary condition for sustainable growth. In previous theoretical works, using dynamical models, we had shown that such synchronization can spontaneously emerge, generation after generation, under a broad set of hypotheses about the architecture of the protocell, the nature of the self-replicating molecules, and the types of kinetic equations. However, an important class of cases (quadratic or higher-order self-replication) did not synchronize in the models we had used, but could actually lead to divergence of the concentration of replicators. We show here that this behavior is due to a simplification of the previous models, i.e., the "buffering" hypothesis, which assumes instantaneous equilibrium of the internal and external concentrations of those compounds which can cross the cell membrane. That divergence disappears if we make use of more realistic dynamical models, with finite transmembrane diffusion rates of the precursors of replicators.

Indexed as

chemical kineticsdiffusion rateFick’s lawself-replicationself-reproductiontransmembrane diffusion

Identifiers

PMID40003151
PMCPMC11854096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.