Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003140›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

As One and Many: Relating Individual and Emergent Group-Level Generative Models in Active Inference.

Peter Thestrup Waade, Christoffer Lundbak Olesen, Jonathan Ehrenreich Laursen, Samuel William Nehrer, Conor Heins, Karl Friston, Christoph Mathys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Five Fristonian Formulae.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter Thestrup WaadeInteracting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6061-0084
Christoffer Lundbak OlesenInteracting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-1463
Jonathan Ehrenreich LaursenSchool of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-7087-3717
Samuel William NehrerSchool of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-5041-6367
Conor HeinsDepartment of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-7728
Karl FristonQueen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
Christoph MathysInteracting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-5453

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active inference under the Free Energy Principle has been proposed as an across-scales compatible framework for understanding and modelling behaviour and self-maintenance. Crucially, a collective of active inference agents can, if they maintain a group-level Markov blanket, constitute a larger group-level active inference agent with a generative model of its own. This potential for computational scale-free structures speaks to the application of active inference to self-organizing systems across spatiotemporal scales, from cells to human collectives. Due to the difficulty of reconstructing the generative model that explains the behaviour of emergent group-level agents, there has been little research on this kind of multi-scale active inference. Here, we propose a data-driven methodology for characterising the relation between the generative model of a group-level agent and the dynamics of its constituent individual agents. We apply methods from computational cognitive modelling and computational psychiatry, applicable for active inference as well as other types of modelling approaches. Using a simple Multi-Armed Bandit task as an example, we employ the new ActiveInference.jl library for Julia to simulate a collective of agents who are equipped with a Markov blanket. We use sampling-based parameter estimation to make inferences about the generative model of the group-level agent, and we show that there is a non-trivial relationship between the generative models of individual agents and the group-level agent they constitute, even in this simple setting. Finally, we point to a number of ways in which this methodology might be applied to better understand the relations between nested active inference agents across scales.

Indexed as

active inferencecognitive modellingcollective intelligenceemergencefree energy principleMarkov blanketmulti-scalepredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID40003140
PMCPMC11853804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.