Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003083›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Effect of Stocking Density on Behavioural and Physiological Traits of Laying Hens.

Kamila Janicka, Kamil Drabik, Karolina Wengerska, Iwona Rozempolska-Rucińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamila JanickaInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-5384
Kamil DrabikInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-8439
Karolina WengerskaInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-2622
Iwona Rozempolska-RucińskaInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analysed stocking density as a major stress factor for laying hens and assessed its impact on selected behavioural and physiological traits of the birds. The study population included 142 birds of the Green-legged Partridge breed (12 males and 132 females). The birds were randomly assigned to three experimental groups of standard, low, and high stocking density, and a modified open-field test was conducted to assess their behavioural traits. The following blood parameters were analysed: corticosterone, cortisol, and testosterone. The behavioural test results demonstrated an impact of stocking density on laying hens' behaviour. The birds kept at a low density exhibited the greatest diversity in behaviour as well as the most frequent and longest locomotion. There were no differences between the groups in terms of stress hormone results. All groups showed a significant decrease in testosterone levels compared to the control. This may suggest that, despite differences in stocking, the structure was established quickly, resulting in decreased competition and, consequently, a positive impact on the birds. When kept in lower-stocking-density groups with a stable structure, birds are less competitive; this stable structure improves their well-being to a greater extent than the stocking density.

Indexed as

behaviourlaying hensstocking densitystress hormones

Identifiers

PMID40003083
PMCPMC11852137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.