Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003022›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Presentation (Chopped Versus Ground and Pelleted) of a Low-Quality Alfalfa Hay in Sheep: Effects on Intake, Feeding Behaviour, Rumen Fill and Digestion, and Passage.

Antonio de Vega, Josep Gasa, Carlos Castrillo, José Antonio Guada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio de VegaDepartamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-8887
Josep GasaDepartamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-7142
Carlos CastrilloDepartamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
José Antonio GuadaDepartamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología PA86-0099-CO2-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A voluminous amount of knowledge has been collected about the effects of the rate and amount of intake and of the rate and amount of digesta flow out of the rumen on rumen fill and, hence, intake. However, the mechanisms by which small particles in the rumen are selected for passage have not been clearly identified. Grinding and pelleting have been alleged to either enhance or reduce entrapment; hence, the relationships between particle size and digestion and passage kinetics are not sufficiently clear, as it is not the effect of rumen digesta particle size on marker dilution kinetics. On these grounds, the aim of the present experiment was to examine the behaviour of small particles within the rumen and determine if their retention time by passage or digestion pathways alter under pelleting and control intake. In the present experiment, the effects of a low-quality alfalfa hay presentation (chopped vs. ground and pelleted) on intake, feeding behaviour, rumen fill and digestion, and passage were assessed in adult wethers. Pelleting increased intake without alteration of either the maximum amount of digesta present in the rumen or degradation rates. The faster dilution rate of the liquid phase with the pelleted hay, likely including significant amounts of particles <0.15 mm, should be the main factor for the higher intake with this diet.

Indexed as

digestionfeeding behaviourforagesintakeparticle sizepassagerumen fillsheep

Identifiers

PMID40003022
PMCPMC11851630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.