Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003007›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Reproduction Traits in Rongchang Pigs Through Machine Learning.

Junge Wang, Jie Chai, Li Chen, Tinghuan Zhang, Xi Long, Shuqi Diao, Dong Chen, Zongyi Guo, Guoqing Tang, Pingxian Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junge WangFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3653-5424
Jie ChaiChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.
Li ChenChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.
Tinghuan ZhangChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.
Xi LongChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.
Shuqi DiaoChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7017-7595
Dong ChenFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Zongyi GuoChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.
Guoqing TangFarm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Pingxian WuChongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.

Funding

the National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs NCTIP-XD/B01the National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFD1301102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing volume of genome sequencing data presents challenges for traditional genome-wide prediction methods in handling large datasets. Machine learning (ML) techniques, which can process high-dimensional data, offer promising solutions. This study aimed to find a genome-wide prediction method for local pig breeds, using 10 datasets with varying SNP densities derived from imputed sequencing data of 515 Rongchang pigs and the Pig QTL database. Three reproduction traits-litter weight, total number of piglets born, and number of piglets born alive-were predicted using six traditional methods and five ML methods, including kernel ridge regression, random forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Adaboost. The methods' efficacy was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and independent tests. The predictive performance of both traditional and ML methods initially increased with SNP density, peaking at 800-900 k SNPs. ML methods outperformed traditional ones, showing improvements of 0.4-4.1%. The integration of GWAS and the Pig QTL database enhanced ML robustness. ML models exhibited superior generalizability, with high correlation coefficients (0.935-0.998) between cross-validation and independent test results. GBDT and random forest showed high computational efficiency, making them promising methods for genomic prediction in livestock breeding.

Indexed as

genomic predictionmachine learningprediction accuracyRongchang pigs

Identifiers

PMID40003007
PMCPMC11852217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.