ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Reproduction Traits in Rongchang Pigs Through Machine Learning.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Integrative transcriptomics and machine learning reveal key regulatory genes for meat quality traits in pigs.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genes and Gene Functions Associated with Morphological, Productive, Reproductive, and Carcass Quality Traits in Pigs: A Functional Bioinformatics Approach.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Genomic Selection for Cashmere Traits in Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goats Using Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting Machine Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genetic Strategies for Improving Pig Robustness: Reducing Antibiotic Use Through Enhanced Resilience and Disease Resistance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing volume of genome sequencing data presents challenges for traditional genome-wide prediction methods in handling large datasets. Machine learning (ML) techniques, which can process high-dimensional data, offer promising solutions. This study aimed to find a genome-wide prediction method for local pig breeds, using 10 datasets with varying SNP densities derived from imputed sequencing data of 515 Rongchang pigs and the Pig QTL database. Three reproduction traits-litter weight, total number of piglets born, and number of piglets born alive-were predicted using six traditional methods and five ML methods, including kernel ridge regression, random forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Adaboost. The methods' efficacy was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and independent tests. The predictive performance of both traditional and ML methods initially increased with SNP density, peaking at 800-900 k SNPs. ML methods outperformed traditional ones, showing improvements of 0.4-4.1%. The integration of GWAS and the Pig QTL database enhanced ML robustness. ML models exhibited superior generalizability, with high correlation coefficients (0.935-0.998) between cross-validation and independent test results. GBDT and random forest showed high computational efficiency, making them promising methods for genomic prediction in livestock breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.