Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003005›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Significant Detection of Porcine Circovirus 3 and Porcine Circovirus 4 in Wild Boars from Mid-Western Spain Without Apparent Sanitary Consequences.

Rocío Holgado-Martín, David Risco, Alfonso Ramos, Remigio Martínez-Pérez, Waldo Luis García-Jiménez, Javier Hermoso-De Mendoza, Luis Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rocío Holgado-MartínDepartamento de Medicina Animal, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica y Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5351-7623
David RiscoDepartamento de Medicina Animal, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica y Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-8801
Alfonso RamosDepartamento de Matemáticas, Unidad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4914-7444
Remigio Martínez-PérezGrupo de Investigación en Sanidad Animal y Zoonosis (GISAZ), Departamento de Sanidad Animal, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba (ROR code 05yc77b46), 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5908-9447
Waldo Luis García-JiménezDepartamento de Medicina Animal, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica y Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5090-5842
Javier Hermoso-De MendozaDepartamento de Salud Animal, Unidad Patología Infecciosa, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5574-4432
Luis GómezDepartamento de Medicina Animal, Unidad de Anatomía Patológica y Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Veterinaria de Cáceres, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7590-7203

Funding

Consejería de Economía, Ciencia y Agenda Digital of Junta de Extremadura IB20027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCV-3 and PCV-4 are novel viruses that can infect domestic pigs and wild boars. Both viruses are associated with multiple disorders in domestic pigs (reproductive failure, respiratory damage, etc.). However, the clinical impact on wild boars remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the presence of these viruses in wild boars from mid-western Spain and their sanitary impact on the species. A total of 166 submandibular lymph nodes were collected from hunted wild boars, along with available information about their reproductive status, lung injuries, body condition, and tuberculosis status. The samples were used to detect PCV-3 and PCV-4 using real-time PCR. In total, 84.9% of the sampled animals were positive for PCV-3, and 33.7% were positive for PCV-4. The detection of PCV-4 was more frequent in wild boars that had received supplementary feeding, suggesting that the direct contact favored by this practice could increase the transmission of this virus in wild boar populations. The infections did not seem to influence the body condition, reproductive status, lung lesions, or TB lesion severity patterns in the studied animals. Thus, although these viruses have been widely detected throughout wild boar populations from the studied area, they do not seem to be a health threat to this species. Nevertheless, their monitoring in wild boars is recommended, as they are often in contact with extensively reared pigs, which are susceptible to these viruses.

Indexed as

epidemiologyporcine circovirus 3porcine circovirus 4wild boars

Identifiers

PMID40003005
PMCPMC11852179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.