Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002974›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Generative AI Meets Animal Welfare: Evaluating GPT-4 for Pet Emotion Detection.

Bekir Cetintav, Yavuz Selim Guven, Engincan Gulek, Aykut Asım Akbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bekir CetintavVeterinary Faculty, Department of Biostatistics, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7251-1211
Yavuz Selim GuvenInstitute of Health Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0007-0097-7523
Engincan GulekInstitute of Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9965-7130
Aykut Asım AkbasVeterinary Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal emotion detection has emerged as a critical domain in understanding animal welfare and enhancing human-animal interactions. This study evaluates the performance of GPT-4, a generative AI model, in recognizing and classifying pet emotions from images, with a particular focus on dogs. The research was conducted in two phases: a general pet emotion classification across multiple species and a dog-specific classification. In Phase 1, GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 50.2%, reflecting its baseline capability in handling diverse animal images. In Phase 2, accuracy significantly improved to 76.7% due to refined prompts and the use of a targeted dataset. Sentiment analysis of the model's textual justifications revealed alignment with visual cues in correct predictions and highlighted challenges in ambiguous cases. These findings demonstrate the potential of generative AI in animal emotion detection and emphasize the importance of targeted datasets and advanced prompt engineering. This study contributes to bridging the gap between AI capabilities and practical applications in animal welfare and behavioral research.

Indexed as

animal emotion detectiondog emotion classificationgenerative AIGPT-4sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID40002974
PMCPMC11851729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.