ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Generative AI Meets Animal Welfare: Evaluating GPT-4 for Pet Emotion Detection.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the capabilities of large vision language models in dog emotion recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Faces of time: a historical overview of rapid innovations in coding animal facial signals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal emotion detection has emerged as a critical domain in understanding animal welfare and enhancing human-animal interactions. This study evaluates the performance of GPT-4, a generative AI model, in recognizing and classifying pet emotions from images, with a particular focus on dogs. The research was conducted in two phases: a general pet emotion classification across multiple species and a dog-specific classification. In Phase 1, GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 50.2%, reflecting its baseline capability in handling diverse animal images. In Phase 2, accuracy significantly improved to 76.7% due to refined prompts and the use of a targeted dataset. Sentiment analysis of the model's textual justifications revealed alignment with visual cues in correct predictions and highlighted challenges in ambiguous cases. These findings demonstrate the potential of generative AI in animal emotion detection and emphasize the importance of targeted datasets and advanced prompt engineering. This study contributes to bridging the gap between AI capabilities and practical applications in animal welfare and behavioral research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.