ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Pet Dog Choice in Hong Kong and Mainland China: Exploring Owners' Motivations, Behaviours, and Perceptions.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Canine Search and Adoption Decision Process: A Conceptual Framework for Companion Pet Shelter Adoption.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Companion Dogs in Vietnam: Exploring Characteristics of Owned and Ideal Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Survival analysis of different treatment modalities and associated outcomes for canine primary pulmonary carcinoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dogs are among the most popular pets worldwide, and ownership is increasing in many regions. Responsible pet ownership positively impacts animal welfare, yet little is known about the drivers of pet choices or their regional variation. To address this knowledge gap, a structured online questionnaire was developed to investigate the motivations, behaviours, perceptions, and demography of owners acquiring dogs. Quality control measures included content validity evaluation by independent experts and back-translation to optimize semantics. Non-probability convenience and purposive sampling was used to recruit respondents through social media and interest groups. In total, 2036 eligible responses were received. Three out of four respondents were female, which is a pattern reported in other regions. Mixed-breed dogs were the most popular, representing around 40% of the total, and non-commercial sources, such as shelters, were the predominant source for new pets (65%). In stark contrast to the UK, USA, and parts of Europe, brachycephalic breeds were the least popular of the purebreds. Poodles were the most frequently owned purebred in both HKSAR and MC. "Companionship for humans" was the most common reason for acquiring a pet dog, and strong agreement with the statement "I consider my dog part of my family" was almost universal (99%). Over half of respondents carried out no research before they acquired their dog (55%), and veterinary professionals were the least frequent resource used by the remainder. Our study reveals commonalities with other regions in drivers for, and perceptions of, pet dogs. Encouragingly from an animal welfare perspective, brachycephalic breeds were the least preferred type. Investigation of the drivers of this observation may be useful to encourage the acquisition of non-brachycephalic dogs in other regions. Overall, our study provides preliminary but valuable insights for developing targeted programs promoting responsible ownership in the region to enhance the well-being of both humans and dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.