ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
A Positive-Reinforcement Training Regimen for Refined Sample Collection in Laboratory Pigs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing evidence-informed practice in modern zoos: research priorities for animal welfare, conservation, and social legitimacy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Intranasal inoculation with African swine fever virus genotype II reveals dose-dependent infectivity, pathogenesis and diagnostic challenges in pigs.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- Assessment of sponge sampling for real-time PCR detection of Cystoisospora suis from environmental and faecal samples from piglet-producing farms.Porcine health management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive-reinforcement training of laboratory pigs can reduce the reliance on forced manual restraint and anaesthesia for sample collection, reducing stress and physiological disruption. Training regimens for laboratory pigs typically rely on specialised equipment for restraint, such as Panepinto slings, with a time investment that may not be justified for short-term studies. These training regimens also commonly rely on pigs being lifted into sling restraints, which is not practical for studies involving large pigs. We developed and assessed a rapid, three-phase, positive-reinforcement training regimen for both individually housed and group-housed laboratory pigs to facilitate the collection of minimally invasive samples consciously and voluntarily. The time to complete each phase of training in both individually housed and group-housed pigs was recorded. The behaviour of the individually housed pigs was assessed via an ethogram of behaviours exhibited during a human approach test, and stress response was assessed by analysing salivary corticosterone. The rapid, positive-reinforcement training regimen successfully facilitated oral swabbing, rectal swabbing and rectal thermometer insertion from individually housed (within 18 days) and group-housed (within 6 days) pigs. The trained pigs displayed increasing positive behaviours, no or very few negative behaviours and corticosterone levels within normal limits throughout the study. This training regimen provides a practical and welfare-positive tool for the collection of minimally invasive samples from both small and large laboratory pigs, with a low time investment of 2-5 min/pig/day without the need for specialised restraint equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.