Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002952›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

A Positive-Reinforcement Training Regimen for Refined Sample Collection in Laboratory Pigs.

Rachel Layton, David Beggs, Andrew Fisher, Peter Mansell, Sarah Riddell, Daniel Layton, David T Williams, Kelly J Stanger

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel LaytonCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-3155-2789
David BeggsMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-9123
Andrew FisherMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.
Peter MansellMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7216-2947
Sarah RiddellCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.
Daniel LaytonCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.
David T WilliamsCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7169-149X
Kelly J StangerCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-363X

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship n/aCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 225256.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive-reinforcement training of laboratory pigs can reduce the reliance on forced manual restraint and anaesthesia for sample collection, reducing stress and physiological disruption. Training regimens for laboratory pigs typically rely on specialised equipment for restraint, such as Panepinto slings, with a time investment that may not be justified for short-term studies. These training regimens also commonly rely on pigs being lifted into sling restraints, which is not practical for studies involving large pigs. We developed and assessed a rapid, three-phase, positive-reinforcement training regimen for both individually housed and group-housed laboratory pigs to facilitate the collection of minimally invasive samples consciously and voluntarily. The time to complete each phase of training in both individually housed and group-housed pigs was recorded. The behaviour of the individually housed pigs was assessed via an ethogram of behaviours exhibited during a human approach test, and stress response was assessed by analysing salivary corticosterone. The rapid, positive-reinforcement training regimen successfully facilitated oral swabbing, rectal swabbing and rectal thermometer insertion from individually housed (within 18 days) and group-housed (within 6 days) pigs. The trained pigs displayed increasing positive behaviours, no or very few negative behaviours and corticosterone levels within normal limits throughout the study. This training regimen provides a practical and welfare-positive tool for the collection of minimally invasive samples from both small and large laboratory pigs, with a low time investment of 2-5 min/pig/day without the need for specialised restraint equipment.

Indexed as

anaesthesiaresearchrestraintstressswinewelfare

Identifiers

PMID40002952
PMCPMC11851642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.