Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002933›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Exploring the Utility of Renal Resistive Index in Critical Care: Insights into ARDS and Cardiac Failure.

Giuseppe Cuttone, Giulio Geraci, Luigi La Via, Massimiliano Sorbello, Federico Pappalardo, Caterina Carollo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing volume status in heart failure: The role of renal duplex ultrasound in evaluating cardiorenal morbidity and heart failure mortality.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Biomarkers as Beacons: Illuminating Sepsis-Associated Hepato-Renal Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe CuttoneFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-5271-1810
Giulio GeraciFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-1151
Luigi La ViaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-7554
Massimiliano SorbelloFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-2788
Federico PappalardoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Heart Centre "GB Morgagni", 95125 Catania, Italy.
Caterina CarolloDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal and Specialistic Medicine (PROMISE), Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, "P. Giaccone" University Hospital, 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-8823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renal resistive index (RRI), a Doppler ultrasound-derived parameter measuring renal vascular resistance, has emerged as a promising non-invasive tool to evaluate renal hemodynamics in critically ill patients, particularly those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and heart failure (HF). This narrative review examines the current evidence for RRI measurement in these conditions, exploring its physiological bases, methodology, clinical applications, and limitations. In ARDS, RRI reflects the complex interactions between positive pressure ventilation, hypoxemia, and systemic inflammation, showing a role in predicting acute kidney injury and monitoring response to interventions. In HF, RRI is able to assess venous congestion and cardiorenal interactions and can also serve as a prognostic indicator. Many studies have shown RRI's superiority or complementarity to traditional biomarkers in predicting renal dysfunction, although its interpretation requires consideration of multiple patient-related factors. Key challenges include operator dependency, lack of standardization, and complex interpretation in multi-organ dysfunction. Future research should focus on measurement standardization, development of automated techniques, investigation of novel applications like intraparenchymal renal resistive index variation, and validation of RRI-guided management strategies. Despite its limitations, RRI represents a valuable tool that offers bedside and real-time insights into renal hemodynamics and potential guidance for therapeutic interventions. Further research is needed to fully clarify its clinical potential and address current limitations, particularly in critical care settings involving multiple organ dysfunction.

Indexed as

ARDScritical careduplex Doppler sonographyheart failurerenal resistive index

Identifiers

PMID40002933
PMCPMC11853387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.