Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002922›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

A Narrative Review on Manufacturing Methods Employed in the Production of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis Therapy.

Rasmus Roost Aabling, Maria Rusan, Anaïs Marie Julie Møller, Naija Munk-Pedersen, Carsten Holm, Brian Elmengaard, Michael Pedersen, Bjarne Kuno Møller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rasmus Roost AablingComparative Medicine Lab, SDCA-Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99 and 11, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria RusanDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Brendstrupgårdsvej 21A, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Anaïs Marie Julie MøllerCenter for Gene and Cellular Therapy, Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Naija Munk-PedersenComparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Carsten HolmDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1G, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.
Brian ElmengaardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1G, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7887-7214
Michael PedersenComparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Bjarne Kuno MøllerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2808-4755

Funding

Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus (SDCA) 43792The Danish Rheumatism Association A8034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory, and degenerative whole-joint disease. Early-stage OA treatments typically include physiotherapy, weight-loss, pain relief medications, and intra-articular knee injections, such as corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, or platelet-rich plasma. These treatments primarily provide symptomatic relief rather than reversing or halting disease progression. Recently, mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) injections have garnered attention due to their immunomodulatory and regenerative capacities. MSCs, which can be derived from sources such as bone marrow, umbilical cord, or adipose tissue, and can be allogeneic or autologous, have demonstrated promising results in both animal models and several human studies. However, different protocols have been employed, presenting challenges for comparing outcomes. In this review, we address these variable settings, evaluate current practices, and identify key factors critical in optimizing MSC-based therapies by critically reviewing clinical trials of ex vivo expanded MSC therapies for OA undertaken between 2008 and 2023. Specific attention was given to two key aspects: (1) the cell culture process employed in manufacturing of autologous or allogeneic MSC products, and (2) the post-culture methods employed in storage, reconstitution and administration of the MSCs. Our findings suggest that standardizing MSC production for clinical applications remains a significant challenge, primarily due to variations in tissue sources, harvesting techniques, and manufacturing protocols, and due to broad discrepancies in reporting. Thus, we propose a set of minimal reporting criteria to guide future clinical trials. A common reporting guideline is a critical step towards a more standardized MSC production across different laboratories and clinical settings, thereby enhancing reproducibility and advancing the field of regenerative medicine for knee OA, as well as other disease settings.

Indexed as

advanced therapy medicinal productcell culturecell storagecryopreservationknee osteoarthritismesenchymal stromal cellsreconstitutionthawingviability

Identifiers

PMID40002922
PMCPMC11853043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.