Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002697›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Non-Invasive Retinal Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.

Snježana Kaštelan, Antonela Gverović Antunica, Velibor Puzović, Ana Didović Pavičić, Samir Čanović, Petra Kovačević, Pia Antonia Franciska Vučemilović, Suzana Konjevoda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Snježana KaštelanSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3983-1157
Antonela Gverović AntunicaDepartment of Ophthalmology, General Hospital Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9613-8033
Velibor PuzovićDepartment of Pathology, General Hospital Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.
Ana Didović PavičićDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zadar General Hospital, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Samir ČanovićDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zadar General Hospital, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Petra KovačevićDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-3427
Pia Antonia Franciska VučemilovićDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zadar General Hospital, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Suzana KonjevodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zadar General Hospital, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-6790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the brain associated with ageing and is the most prevalent form of dementia, affecting an estimated 55 million people worldwide, with projections suggesting this number will exceed 150 million by 2050. With its increasing prevalence, AD represents a significant global health challenge with potentially serious social and economic consequences. Diagnosing AD is particularly challenging as it requires timely recognition. Currently, there is no effective therapy for AD; however, certain medications may help slow its progression. Existing diagnostic methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and biomarker analysis in cerebrospinal fluid tend to be expensive and invasive, making them impractical for widespread use. Consequently, research into non-invasive biomarkers that enable early detection and screening for AD is a crucial area of contemporary clinical investigation. One promising approach for the early diagnosis of AD may be retinal imaging. As an extension of the central nervous system, the retina offers a distinctive opportunity for non-invasive brain structure and function assessment. Considering their shared embryological origins and the vascular and immunological similarities between the eye and brain, alterations in the retina may indicate pathological changes in the brain, including those specifically related to AD. Studies suggest that structural and vascular changes in the retina, particularly within the neuronal network and blood vessels, may act as markers of cerebral changes caused by AD. These retinal alterations have the potential to act as biomarkers for early diagnosis. Since AD is typically diagnosed only after a significant neuronal loss has occurred, identifying early diagnostic markers could enable timely intervention and help prevent disease progression. Non-invasive retinal imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography, provide accessible methods for the early detection of changes linked to AD. This review article focuses on the potential of retinal imaging as a non-invasive biomarker for early diagnosis of AD. Investigating the ageing of the retina and its connections to neurodegenerative processes could significantly enhance the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of AD, paving the way for new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseearly diagnosisneurodegenerative disordersnon-invasive imagingOCT angiographyoptical coherence tomography (OCT)retinal biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40002697
PMCPMC11852429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.