ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: Unraveling the Journey from Incidental Discovery to Clinical Significance.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progression of interstitial lung abnormalities and its impact on mortality in patients with lung cancer resection.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Interstitial lung abnormalities: to treat or not to treat? The hamlet dilemma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental radiologic abnormalities on chest computed tomography (CT) examination performed on people in whom interstitial lung disease (ILD) is not suspected. Despite the fact that most of these individuals are asymptomatic, ILAs are not synonymous with subclinical ILD, as a subset of them have symptoms and lung function impairment. On the other hand, not all ILAs progress to clinically significant ILD. Specific imaging features and patterns have been proven more likely to progress, while some individuals may comprise a higher risk group for progression. Numerous studies have demonstrated that ILAs are not only associated with an increased risk of progression toward pulmonary fibrosis and fibrosis-related mortality but are also linked to a greater incidence of lung cancer and a higher rate of all-cause mortality. Considering that the systematic evaluation of large cohorts has shown a prevalence of ILAs up to 7% and that the natural history of ILAs is unclear, successful screening and appropriate monitoring of ILAs is of particular significance for earlier diagnosis, risk factor modification, and treatment. The present review aims to summarize the current knowledge on ILAs and highlight the need to define those at greatest risk of progression to ILD and worse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.