Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Giorgia PerniolaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-9828
Giulia Paoni SacconeDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Noemi TontiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-3503-5010
Federica TanziDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Innocenza PalaiaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Violante Di DonatoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9254-5790
Federica TomaoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Ludovico MuziiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-9583
Giorgio BoganiGynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Ilaria CuccuDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Enrico CiminelloIstituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesco Antonio BattagliaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Giusi SantangeloDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
cervical cancerNACTpredictive role of ultrasoundpresurgical stagingradical surgeryRIUAUS in cervical cancer
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Role of Pelvic Ultrasound in Predicting the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. · full record | OpenQuestion