ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sudden Cardiac Death: The Role of Molecular Autopsy with Next-Generation Sequencing.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary and Personalized Molecular Diagnosis to Solving Sudden Death During Sport.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Post-Mortem Biomarkers in Sudden Cardiac Death: From Classical Biochemistry to Molecular Autopsy and Multi-Omics Forensic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Pathology of Cardiomyopathies: Bridging Morphology, Genomics, and Clinical Phenotypes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Unraveling Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Sudden Cardiac Death: Integrating Pathology, Genetics, and Molecular Autopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Sudden cardiac death in the young: single-center study of Bari autopsy cases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular autopsy is a term employed to describe the investigation of the cause of death through the analysis of genetic information using biological samples collected post-mortem. Its utility becomes evident in situations where conventional medico-legal autopsy methods are not able to identify the cause of death, i.e., in sudden cardiac death (SCD) cases in young individuals, where deaths are commonly due to genetic cardiac conditions, such as cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. The recent advancement in high-throughput sequencing techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), has allowed the investigation of a high number of genomic regions in a more cost-effective and faster approach. Unlike traditional sequencing methods, which can only sequence one DNA fragment at a time, NGS can sequence millions of short polynucleotide fragments simultaneously. This parallel approach reduces both the time and cost required to generate large-scale genomic data, making it a useful tool for applications ranging from basic research to molecular autopsy. In the forensic context, by enabling the examination of multiple genes or entire exomes and genomes, NGS enhances the accuracy and depth of genetic investigations, contributing to a better understanding of complex inherited diseases. However, challenges remain, such as the interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS), the need for standardized protocols, and the high demand for specialized bioinformatics expertise. Despite these challenges, NGS continues to offer significant promise for enhancing the precision of molecular autopsies. The goal of this review is to assess the effectiveness of contemporary advancements in molecular autopsy methodologies when applied to cases of SCD in young individuals and to present an overview of the steps involved in the analysis of NGS data and the interpretation of genetic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.