ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of Autopsy in the Forensic and Clinical Evaluation of Head Trauma and Traumatic Brain Injury in Road Traffic Accidents: A Review of the Literature.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shaken Adult Syndrome: Defining a New Traumatic Entity with an Evidence-Based Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patterns, Causes, and Mortality Trends of Road Traffic Accidents in Hamedan Province, Iran: A Spatiotemporal Epidemiological Analysis (2011-2024).Journal of research in health sciences · 2026Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, frequently resulting in traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), skull fractures, and spinal injuries. This manuscript examines the forensic aspects of head trauma caused by RTAs, focusing on the role of autopsy and imaging in diagnosing and characterizing injuries. Through a systematic review of the literature, the study highlights the mechanisms of injury, including high-speed collisions, whiplash, and pedestrian impacts, and explores their pathological consequences, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, and diffuse axonal injury. The differentiation between traumatic and non-traumatic conditions, such as aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, is emphasized to ensure accurate clinical and forensic assessments. Advances in imaging technologies, particularly virtopsy, are discussed for their potential in non-invasive documentation and analysis of head injuries, while limitations of this approach are acknowledged. Furthermore, the manuscript underscores the importance of preventive measures, including helmet and seatbelt use, vehicle safety innovations, and improved road design, in reducing the incidence and severity of RTAs. By integrating clinical, forensic, and preventive perspectives, this study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing the burden of head trauma related to RTAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.