ArticleBrain sciences2025
Complex Spiking Neural Network Evaluated by Injury Resistance Under Stochastic Attacks.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain-inspired models are commonly employed for artificial intelligence. However, the complex environment can hinder the performance of electronic equipment. Therefore, enhancing the injury resistance of brain-inspired models is a crucial issue. Human brains have self-adaptive abilities under injury, so drawing on the advantages of the human brain to construct a brain-inspired model is intended to enhance its injury resistance. But current brain-inspired models still lack bio-plausibility, meaning they do not sufficiently draw on real neural systems' structure or function.
methodsTo address this challenge, this paper proposes the complex spiking neural network (Com-SNN) as a brain-inspired model, in which the topology is inspired by the topological characteristics of biological functional brain networks, the nodes are Izhikevich neuron models, and the edges are synaptic plasticity models with time delay co-regulated by excitatory synapses and inhibitory synapses. To evaluate the injury resistance of the Com-SNN, two injury-resistance metrics are investigated and compared with SNNs with alternative topologies under the stochastic removal of neuron models to simulate the consequence of stochastic attacks. In addition, the injury-resistance mechanism of brain-inspired models remains unclear, and revealing the mechanism is crucial for understanding the development of SNNs with injury resistance. To address this challenge, this paper analyzes the synaptic plasticity dynamic regulation and dynamic topological characteristics of the Com-SNN under stochastic attacks.
resultsThe experimental results indicate that the injury resistance of the Com-SNN is superior to that of other SNNs, demonstrating that our results can help improve the injury resistance of SNNs.
conclusionsOur results imply that synaptic plasticity is an intrinsic element impacting injury resistance, and that network topology is another element that impacts injury resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.