Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002457›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

CLTNet: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Motor Imagery Classification.

He Gu, Tingwei Chen, Xiao Ma, Mengyuan Zhang, Yan Sun, Jian Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [A motor imagery decoding study integrating differential attention with a multi-scale adaptive temporal convolutional network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

He GuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Tingwei ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Xiao MaCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Mengyuan ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Yan SunCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Jian ZhaoCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3265-6461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain-computer interface (BCI) technology opens up new avenues for human-machine interaction and rehabilitation by connecting the brain to machines. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor imagery (MI) classification is a key component of BCI technology, which is capable of translating neural activity in the brain into commands for controlling external devices. Despite the great potential of BCI technology, the challenges of extracting and decoding brain signals limit its wide application.

methodsTo address this challenge, this study proposes a novel hybrid deep learning model, CLTNet, which focuses on solving the feature extraction problem to improve the classification of MI-EEG signals. In the preliminary feature extraction stage, CLTNet uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract time series, channel, and spatial features of EEG signals to obtain important local information. In the deep feature extraction stage, the model combines the long short-term memory (LSTM) network and the Transformer module to capture time-series data and global dependencies in the EEG. The LSTM explains the dynamics of the brain activity, while the Transformer's self-attention mechanism reveals the global features of the time series. Ultimately, the CLTNet model classifies motor imagery EEG signals through a fully connected layer.

resultsThe model achieved an average accuracy of 83.02% and a Kappa value of 0.77 on the BCI IV 2a dataset, and 87.11% and a Kappa value of 0.74 on the BCI IV 2b dataset, both of which outperformed the traditional methods.

conclusionsThe innovation of the CLTNet model is that it integrates multiple network architectures, which offers a more comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the EEG signals during motor imagery, providing a more comprehensive perspective and establishing a new benchmark for future research in this area.

Indexed as

brain–computer interfaceconvolutional neural networkdeep learninglong short-term memory networkmotor imagerymulti-head attention

Identifiers

PMID40002457
PMCPMC11852626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.