ReviewBrain sciences2025
A New Way to Treat Central Nervous System Dysfunction Caused by Musculoskeletal Injuries Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Countermovement Jump and Quantitative Electroencephalography Assessment in Division I Football Athletes: An Exploratory Neurophysiological Study of Return‑to‑Play Readiness.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Effects of Transcranial Neuromodulation on Rehabilitation Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Modulating cortical excitability through transcranial direct current stimulation combined with therapeutic exercise for craniofacial myofascial pain: Randomized controlled trial.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal injuries can have far-reaching consequences on brain function, leading to reduced motor control, altered movement patterns, increased inhibition of the injured muscle and joint, and changes in neuroplasticity. These deficits, controlled in part by the central nervous system (CNS), might be alleviated with an appropriate adjuvant treatment. One possibly suited treatment at the CNS level is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which modulates cortical excitability and further neuroplasticity.
objectivesThe present review outlines the multifaceted repercussions of common musculo-skeletal injuries on CNS functions and presents original studies that mostly report beneficial effects regarding the use of the tDCS intervention in people who had experienced musculoskeletal injury rehabilitation.
resultsThe first evidence suggests that tDCS, targeting brain areas responsible for motor control or on sensory and pain-related brain regions, may offer significant benefits in the recovery of brain function and motor performance following musculoskeletal injuries. Key findings include enhanced motor function, altered CNS excitability and inhibition, and reduced pain perception, all contributing to improved rehabilitation outcomes. However, the paucity of studies and the heterogeneity of injuries render it challenging to ascertain the optimal treatment parameters. Furthermore, the variability regarding stimulation parameters is a crucial aspect that remains to be addressed and limits the possibility of generalizing these first findings.
conclusionsIt is concluded that well-powered trials with standardized protocols should be conducted to confirm these effects and establish clear clinical guidelines for the use of tDCS in sports injury rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.