Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002187›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Multidisciplinary Treatment for Lymphorrhea and Chylorrhea Following Lymph Node Dissection for Genitourinary Cancer.

Naoto Kamiya, Takahide Noro, Taro Okazaki, Naoki Ishitsuka, Yuta Suzuki, Shota Iijima, Yuka Sugizaki, Takatoshi Somoto, Ryo Oka, Takanobu Utsumi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Naoto KamiyaDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4183-2490
Takahide NoroDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Taro OkazakiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Naoki IshitsukaDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Yuta SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Shota IijimaDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Yuka SugizakiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Takatoshi SomotoDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Ryo OkaDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Takanobu UtsumiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-7361
Takumi EndoDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Shusuke KasuyaDepartment of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9032-3994
Nobuyuki HirutaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-114X

Funding

Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 24k12519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node dissection (LND) is often performed in genitourinary cancer to improve accurate staging. However, the resultant lymphatic damage often leads to postoperative lymphorrhea and chylorrhea. Further, since lymphatic fluid lacks platelets, it has very few clotting factors, and it is often difficult to treat postoperative lymphatic leakage. Treatments for lymphorrhea include conservative treatment (e.g., fasting, total parenteral nutrition, and drug therapy), interventional radiology (IR) and surgical treatment. However, there is no guideline of refractory lymphorrhea, and no clear criteria for switching to the next treatment.

methodsWe reviewed the records of 28 patients at Toho University Sakura Medical Center with postoperative lymphorrhea or chylorrhea after LND that did not improve with conservative treatment. Based on this analysis, we partially revised the treatment algorithm for lymphorrhea developed by Rose et al. Results: The cases consisted of 26 men and two women, aged 65.0 ± 9.9 years. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 25.3 ± 15.0. Octreotide was administered in 27 patients, lymphangiography was performed in three patients, and lymphatic embolization was performed in two patients. The mean duration of octreotide administration was 9.7 ± 6.1 days, and the mean dose was 211.1 µg/day. The treatment success rates with octreotide and IR were 78.6% and 100%, respectively. The mean duration of drain placement after surgery for primary cancer was 18.3 ± 14.3 days.

conclusionsPatients with lymphorrhea and chylorrhea should be initially treated conservatively, with IR performed if conservative treatment is unsuccessful. Surgical treatment should be a last resort.

Indexed as

chylorrheainterventional radiologyintranodal lymphangiographylymphatic embolizationlymph node dissectionlymphorrheaoctreotide

Identifiers

PMID40002187
PMCPMC11853674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.