Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002112›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Establishment of a Daqu Grade Classification Model Based on Computer Vision and Machine Learning.

Mengke Zhao, Chaoyue Han, Tinghui Xue, Chao Ren, Xiao Nie, Xu Jing, Haiyong Hao, Qifang Liu, Liyan Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengke ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5824-3280
Chaoyue HanCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Tinghui XueCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Chao RenCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Xiao NieCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Xu JingCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-3335
Haiyong HaoShanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd., Fenyang 032200, China.
Qifang LiuCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Liyan JiaCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.

Funding

Liyan Jia 202302140601016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The grade of Daqu significantly influences the quality of Baijiu. To address the issues of high subjectivity, substantial labor costs, and low detection efficiency in Daqu grade evaluation, this study focused on light-flavor Daqu and proposed a two-layer classification structure model based on computer vision and machine learning. Target images were extracted using three image segmentation methods: threshold segmentation, morphological fusion, and K-means clustering. Feature factors were selected through methods including mean decrease accuracy based on random forest (RF-MDA), recursive feature elimination (RFE), LASSO regression, and ridge regression. The Daqu grade evaluation model was constructed using support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and a stacking model. The results indicated the following: (1) In terms of image segmentation performance, the morphological fusion method achieved an accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC of 96.67%, 95.00%, 95.00%, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively. (2) For the classification of Daqu-P, Daqu-F, and Daqu-S, RF models performed best, achieving an accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC of 96.67%, 97.50%, 97.50%, 0.97, and 0.99, respectively. (3) In distinguishing Daqu-P from Daqu-F, the combination of the RF-MDA method and the stacking model demonstrated the best performance, with an accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC of 90.00%, 94.44%, 85.00%, 0.89, and 0.95, respectively. This study provides theoretical and technical support for efficient and objective Daqu grade evaluation.

Indexed as

evaluation modelfeature factorsimage segmentationlight-flavor Daqumachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40002112
PMCPMC11854463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.