ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Nutrition Knowledge Varies by Food Group and Nutrient Among Adults.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Analysis of the Nutritional Value of Diets Generated by Large Language Models Under Average User Conditions-3(LM)Diet Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Optimizing nourishment: nutritional knowledge, practices, and cultural beliefs among postpartum lactating mothers in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Identifying Distinct Profiles of Nutrition Knowledge and Dietary Practices, and Their Determinants Among Adult Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Association of dieting self-efficacy, weight management nutrition knowledge, physical activity, and dietary pattern among Turkish adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Pea and Lentil Flours Increase Postprandial Glycemic Response in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Healthy food and dietary patterns: a cross-sectional study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The United States Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) have provided recommendations for healthy eating patterns to meet nutrient needs and reduce chronic disease risk for decades. However, few Americans fully meet these guidelines, especially regarding five shortfall nutrients, and the vegetable, fruit, pulse, whole grain, and dairy food groups. Nutrition knowledge is a modifiable factor associated with improved dietary behavior, yet it is unclear whether individuals with nutrition-related chronic diseases possess greater knowledge. The study objectives were to (1) describe knowledge of 10 nutrient sources across six food groups, and (2) determine predictive factors for nutrient source and food group knowledge. A national sample of 930 adults from an online panel answered demographic, nutrition-disease knowledge, desired benefits from foods, chronic disease status questions, and identified the presence or absence of 10 nutrients in six food groups. Respondents were 77% White, 51% women, and 70% married, with a mean age of 45 years. Nutrition-disease knowledge was higher for those who were older, women, and highly educated. Having a nutrition-related disease, e.g., heart disease, was not predictive of nutrient-disease knowledge. Whole grains had the highest average nutrient knowledge score (6.26 ± 2.5; range 0-10), while vegetables had the lowest (4.89 ± 2.3). Fat food sources were the best known (3.98 ± 1.5; range 0-6), and folate was the least recognized (2.16 ± 1.4). General linear models of survey variables for the six food groups explained 10.2% to 19.4% of nutrient knowledge variation and described 4.7% to 27.1% of differences in food-source scores for the 10 nutrients. Nutrient-disease knowledge had the most significant influence on nutrient source scores. Gaps in understanding nutrient sources suggest the public needs more applied education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.