ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Profiling the Nutritional, Phytochemical, and Functional Properties of Mung Bean Varieties.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution and Occurrence of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Mungbean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Bioactive Peptide Fractions from Mung Bean Protein Hydrolysate: Antioxidant Activity, Anti-Inflammatory Effects, and Immunomodulatory Responses in RAW 264.7 Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Green synthesis of binary FeOOH/FeBMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Decoding the genetic architecture of seed quality traits in mungbean through quantitative trait loci mapping.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Micro- and Nanoplastics and Functional Nutrients in Human Health: Epigenetic Mechanisms and Cellular Resilience Signaling in Brain Insulin Resistance and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Ethiopian Agricultural Research Institute (EARI) adopted four mung bean varieties for cultivation, following extensive research on their adaptability, productivity, and drought tolerance. However, the physicochemical, techno-functional, and antioxidant properties of these cultivars, which can vary significantly due to genetic and agro-ecological differences, have not been sufficiently explored in previous research. Hence, this study aimed to elucidate these properties to facilitate their seamless integration into food formulation and product development. The study results revealed that the protein content of these varieties ranged from 22.63 to 25.84 g/100 g, while carbohydrate content ranged from 54.9 to 58.82 g/100 g. Moreover, all examined varieties exhibited elevated levels of essential amino acids, particularly lysine, phenylalanine, and leucine. The foaming capacity and emulsion activity varied between 40.27-49.2% and 52.75-54.13%, respectively. The loss modulus of all varieties surpassed the storage modulus. Total polyphenol and flavonoid contents ranged from 2.36 to 3.05 mg GAE/g and 1.42 to 2.22 mg QE/g, respectively. The antioxidant activities were assessed using different assays and revealed that all samples were concentration-dependent, with all cultivars exhibiting high antioxidant activity at higher concentrations. The comparative analysis of the examined varieties revealed that none excelled in all of the tested parameters. However, these diverse qualities make Ethiopian mung bean varieties suitable for various food formulations tailored to specific desired characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.