ArticleBiology2025
A Novel Quantification Method for Gene-Edited Animal Detection Based on ddPCR.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As gene-editing technologies continue to evolve, gene-edited products are making significant strides. These products have already been commercialized in the United States and Japan, prompting global attention to their safety and regulatory oversight. However, the detection of gene editing still relies on qPCR, and there is a lack of quantitative detection methods to quantify gene-editing components in products. To ensure consumer safety and transparency, we developed a novel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based detection method for gene-edited products. Primers and probes were designed targeting the editing sites of MSTN-edited cattle, and the method was evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, real sample testing, and detection thresholds. Our results demonstrate that this ddPCR method is highly specific, with a detection limit of 5 copies/µL, and it successfully detected MSTN edits in all 11 tested samples. Tests using both actual gene-edited cattle samples and plasmid DNA at concentrations of 5%, 1%, and 0.01% yielded consistent results, indicating the method's suitability for real-world applications. This ddPCR assay provides a sensitive and specific tool for detecting MSTN gene-edited cattle and determining the presence of gene-edited products, offering crucial support for regulatory monitoring of gene-edited animal-derived foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.