Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001955›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Reflections on the Role of Differentiation Processes in Forming Behavioral Phenotypes: Can These Processes Replace the Concepts of Plastic Phenotype and Reversible Plastic Phenotype?

Pilar Chiappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pilar ChiappaDepartamento de Etología, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Camino a Xochimilco 101, Col. San Lorenzo Huipulco, alc. Tlalpan, Mexico City 14370, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1353-6480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This essay presents two lines of argument to suggest that the extension into adulthood of specific phenotypic differentiation processes, typical of early development, is fundamental to the evolution of cognition. The first of these two lines of argument is organized in three steps. The first step reviews various studies of human development, highlighting that it has slowed down throughout evolution compared to that of great apes. The second step explores the relationship between this slowed development and human cognition. The third step discusses evolutionary comparative analyses that show a correlation between the evolution of cognitive processes and developmental changes. The second line of argument examines concepts of phenotype. First, the concepts of phenotype are reviewed in correspondence to the two meanings of the word plasticity (i.e., as the ability to alternate or as the ability to shape), and it is concluded that all phenotypes -rigid, plastic, and reversible-fit the meaning of shaping. It is proposed that a phenotypical process can be seen as a continuous series of functional differentiations that occur at different times during the life of the organism and at different contextual points, both inside and outside the organism. Finally, a brief recapitulation is presented that is focused on supporting the formation of behavioral phenotypes as a sequence of differentiation processes shaping the environmental interactions from the most general to the most particular.

Indexed as

adult neuronal differentiationbehavioral plasticityhuman neoteny

Identifiers

PMID40001955
PMCPMC11852096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.