ArticleBiology2025
Inhibition of MEK1/2 Signaling Pathway Limits M2 Macrophage Polarization and Interferes in the Dental Socket Repair Process in Mice.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterial strategies for precision regeneration of the tooth extraction socket: integrating site phenotype, pathological microenvironment, and healing sequence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Identification of M2 macrophage-related biomarkers for a predictive model of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy after kidney transplantation by machine learning algorithms.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental socket repair theoretically involves a constructive inflammatory immune response, which evolves from an initial M1 prevalence to a subsequent M2 dominance. In this scenario, the MEK1/2 signaling pathway is allegedly involved in M2 polarization. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of MEK1/2 pharmacological inhibition in the local host response and repair outcome. C57Bl/6-WT 8-week-old male mice were submitted to the extraction of the right upper incisor and treated (or not, control group) with MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 (10 mg/kg/24 h/IP, MEK1/2i group) and analyzed at 0, 3, 7, and 14 days using microcomputed tomography, histomorphometry, birefringence, immunohistochemistry, and PCR array analysis. The results demonstrate that MEK1/2 inhibition limits the development of M2 response over time, being associated with lower expression of M2, MSCs, and bone markers, lower levels of growth and osteogenic factors, along with a higher expression of iNOS, IL-1b, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well inflammatory chemokines, indicating a predominantly M1 pro-inflammatory environment. This modulation of local inflammatory immune response is associated with impaired bone formation as demonstrated by microtomographic and histomorphometric data. The results show that MEK1/2 inhibition delays bone repair after tooth extraction, supporting the concept that M2 macrophages are essential elements for host response regulation and proper repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.