Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001842›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Estimating the Minimum Sample Size for Neural Network Model Fitting-A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.

Yongtian Cheng, Konstantinos Vassilis Petrides, Johnson Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongtian ChengDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London (UCL), 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-9569-6263
Konstantinos Vassilis PetridesDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London (UCL), 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7130-8673
Johnson LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of machine learning, many psychological studies use machine learning methods. Specifically, neural networks, a set of machine learning methods that exhibit exceptional performance in various tasks, have been used on psychometric datasets for supervised model fitting. From the computer scientist's perspective, psychometric independent variables are typically ordinal and low-dimensional-characteristics that can significantly impact model performance. To our knowledge, there is no guidance about the sample planning suggestion for this task. Therefore, we conducted a simulation study to test the performance of an NN with different sample sizes and the simulation of both linear and nonlinear relationships. We proposed the minimum sample size for the neural network model fitting with two criteria: the performance of 95% of the models is close to the theoretical maximum, and 80% of the models can outperform the linear model. The findings of this simulation study show that the performance of neural networks can be unstable with ordinal variables as independent variables, and we suggested that neural networks should not be used on ordinal independent variables with at least common nonlinear relationships in psychology. Further suggestions and research directions are also provided.

Indexed as

neural networksordinal datasetpredictive performancereproducibilitysample size

Identifiers

PMID40001842
PMCPMC11851979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.