Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001840›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Population Survey on Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Sarah Huf, Ada Humphrey, Ara Darzi, Deborah Cunningham, Dominic King, Gaby Judah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah HufDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ada HumphreyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ara DarziDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Deborah CunninghamDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Dominic KingDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Gaby JudahDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3322-9760

Funding

National Institute for Healthcare Research (NIHR) NIHR204292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the UK, breast cancer affects 1 in 8 women, accounting for 31% of cancers and 15% of cancer-related deaths in women. In 2023, London's breast screening coverage was 56%, falling below the NHS target of 70%. This survey assesses psychological and behavioural factors impacting screening attendance.

methodsUsing the Theoretical Domains Framework, an online survey including 15 behavioural factors was distributed through a market research company to women eligible for breast screening (aged 47-73) across London and Southeast and West England. Logistic regression was used to predict the impact of behavioural variables on history of attendance and intention to attend future screening opportunities.

resultsOf the 922 respondents who returned the full survey, 88.6% intended to attend future screenings, and 88.1% reported previously attending screenings regularly. 'Behavioural regulation' had the strongest influence on past attendance (OR = 1.92,

conclusionsThis survey identifies behavioural factors influencing breast screening participation and screening intention, providing insights that may help design interventions to increase attendance rates.

Indexed as

behavioural sciencebreast cancerpublic healthscreening

Identifiers

PMID40001840
PMCPMC11851805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.