ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Illiterate and Low-Educated People: Systematic Review About the Use of Brief Cognitive Screening Tools.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07630688 (Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive screening for MCI in low-educated and illiterate older adults: comparative diagnostic accuracy of four instruments.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of cognitive performance in idiopathic adult-onset dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Research on Threshold Optimization and Variability-Based Digital Biomarker Approaches Through MMSE-Lifelog Multimodal Integrated Analysis from a Clinical Screening Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond the cut-off: measurement bias, calibration, and fairness in mild cognitive impairment screening.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Psychometric properties of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale - Peruvian Version among Indigenous Amazonian communities.NPJ dementia · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning screening model for MoCA-defined possible mild cognitive impairment in rural Xinjiang: a preliminary framework for resource-limited primary care.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Dementia screening protocol for primary care in South America: a Delphi consensus study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Lightweight Deep Learning Models with Explainable AI for Early Alzheimer's Detection from Standard MRI Scans.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Translating lifestyle interventions for optimal brain health in Africa.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) in a Dutch Memory Clinic.Alzheimer disease and associated disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising prevalence of dementia, particularly in low-income and developing countries, highlights the urgent need for effective cognitive screening tools. However, the existing tools often fail to address the unique needs of low-educated and illiterate populations, leading to diagnostic disparities. This review aimed to evaluate cognitive screening tests and domains employed globally to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in low-educated and illiterate older adults. Following the PRISMA guidelines, Searches were performed in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, targeting studies from January 2000 to 2023 involving adults over 45 years old. Of 1611 studies identified, 27 met the inclusion criteria and underwent pair review. The results revealed that most studies preferred adapting the existing tools to local languages over developing culturally tailored instruments. Twelve cognitive tests specifically designed for low-educated populations were identified, with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) being the most utilized, despite their educational biases. Adjusting the cutoff points improved detection (e.g., MoCA: sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 82%). Notably, the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) demonstrated superior performance for low-educated groups (sensitivity 89% and specificity 93%). The findings underscore the critical need for region-specific cognitive batteries that integrate functional assessments, ensuring equitable and accurate diagnosis across diverse educational backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.