Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001837›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment Identification in Illiterate and Low-Educated People: Systematic Review About the Use of Brief Cognitive Screening Tools.

Jonathan Adrián Zegarra-Valdivia, Brenda Chino, Kuripacha Tituana, Lina Zapata-Restrepo, María Martha Unaucho, Milton Lopez-Norori, Carmen Paredes-Manrique, Nilton Custodio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07630688 (Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07630688 completednot on this map

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the MoCA-B Test

TypeobservationalSponsorAntalya Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled166ConditionsBehavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia, Dementia, Dementia (Diagnosis), Dementia Alzheimer Type
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of cognitive performance in idiopathic adult-onset dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan Adrián Zegarra-ValdiviaFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Km5 Road to Pimentel, Chiclayo 14001, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-0497-5270
Brenda ChinoCenter of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-263X
Kuripacha TituanaGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 90025, USA.
Lina Zapata-RestrepoGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 90025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-4981
María Martha UnauchoGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 90025, USA.
Milton Lopez-NororiGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 90025, USA.
Carmen Paredes-ManriqueFacultad de Psicologia, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 15073, Peru.
Nilton CustodioInstituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima 15046, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-8025-3272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising prevalence of dementia, particularly in low-income and developing countries, highlights the urgent need for effective cognitive screening tools. However, the existing tools often fail to address the unique needs of low-educated and illiterate populations, leading to diagnostic disparities. This review aimed to evaluate cognitive screening tests and domains employed globally to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in low-educated and illiterate older adults. Following the PRISMA guidelines, Searches were performed in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, targeting studies from January 2000 to 2023 involving adults over 45 years old. Of 1611 studies identified, 27 met the inclusion criteria and underwent pair review. The results revealed that most studies preferred adapting the existing tools to local languages over developing culturally tailored instruments. Twelve cognitive tests specifically designed for low-educated populations were identified, with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) being the most utilized, despite their educational biases. Adjusting the cutoff points improved detection (e.g., MoCA: sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 82%). Notably, the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) demonstrated superior performance for low-educated groups (sensitivity 89% and specificity 93%). The findings underscore the critical need for region-specific cognitive batteries that integrate functional assessments, ensuring equitable and accurate diagnosis across diverse educational backgrounds.

Indexed as

cognitive screening testdementiailliteracylow educationmiddle cognitive impairmentolder adults

Identifiers

PMID40001837
PMCPMC11851668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.