Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001828›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Exploring the Validity of Adolescent Responses to a Measure of Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility.

Caleb D Farley, Tyler L Renshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caleb D FarleyDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0547-092X
Tyler L RenshawDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-5126

Funding

This study was supported in part by a Graduate Student Research Award from the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services at Utah State University. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validating measures of psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) has occurred in multiple adult samples, but little research has validated PF and PI measures with adolescents. This manuscript describes two studies exploring the validity of responses to the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) with two samples of adolescents. The first study used exploratory factor analyses on responses to the MPFI with a sample of 16-17-year-olds (

Indexed as

adolescentsmeasurementmental healthpsychological flexibilitypsychological inflexibilityscreeningvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40001828
PMCPMC11852026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.