ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Platform Governance, Institutional Distance, and Seller Trust in Cross-Border E-Commerce.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust from sellers is essential for the success of cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) platforms, and effective platform governance plays a crucial role in shaping and maintaining this trust. However, institutional distance can lead to deviations in sellers' understanding and implementation of platform governance mechanisms, posing a threat to the establishment of trust relationships. Research on the impact of platform governance mechanisms on trust from the seller's perspective is still relatively limited. Therefore, we aim to investigate the mechanisms through which formal governance mechanisms (normative, supervisory, and reward-punishment mechanisms) and relational governance mechanisms (community building) influence seller trust, and we examine the moderating effect of institutional distance. Through empirical analysis of 391 valid questionnaires, our results show that normative mechanisms and community building enhance seller trust by reducing their perceived risks, while the supervisory mechanism and reward-punishment mechanism directly affect seller-perceived risks and platform trust. Institutional distance negatively moderates the governance effectiveness of these mechanisms. Our findings offer significant theoretical contributions by advancing the understanding of seller behavior, extending platform governance and trust theory in CBEC research field, and enriching institutional distance frameworks, while providing practical insights for platforms to optimize governance mechanisms to foster seller trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.