ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Good Behavior Game: Effects on Disruptive Behaviors of Students with and Without Special Educational Needs in Inclusive Setting.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a practical and evidence-based classroom management strategy that requires minimal time and resources to learn and implement. This study investigates the effectiveness of the GBG in reducing disruptive behaviors among students with special educational needs (SEN) and compares the degree of behavioral change between students with and without SEN. Additionally, the study examines students' perceptions of the GBG. An ABAB reversal design with a follow-up phase was employed to evaluate the intervention's effects. The study included six participants: three students with SEN who exhibited disruptive behaviors, aged 11 to 14, and three students without SEN who also exhibited disruptive behaviors, aged 11 to 13. The results indicate that the GBG is highly effective in reducing disruptive behaviors, with similar levels of improvement observed in both groups. The social validity findings highlight that students found the GBG enjoyable and engaging. The study discusses its limitations and provides practical implications for educators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.