ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Supporting Families to 'Make the Most' of the Relationship Between Their Companion Dogs and Their Children with Autism Spectrum Condition: A Qualitative Exploration of the 'Family Dog Service'.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maximising the Potential Benefit of Living with Companion Dogs for Autistic Children and Their Families: A Mixed-Methods Survey of the Impact of a Novel 'Family Dog Service'.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence suggests that assistance and therapy dogs can positively impact the mental and physical health of children with autism spectrum condition (ASC) and their families. However, these services are often costly and inaccessible. As an alternative, companion dogs (e.g., non-specialist-trained pet dogs) may offer similar benefits. To support families in selecting and training a dog to benefit the whole family, a charity named Dogs for Good has designed the Family Dog Service. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceived impact of human-dog interactions and relationships for children with ASC and their families, and their perceptions of the Family Dog Service. Interviews were conducted with 16 parents of children with ASC who had engaged with the service within the last five years. Thematic analysis identified four main themes. These related to the positive impact of the companion dog on the child with ASC (e.g., enhanced focus and attention, reduction in loneliness, and reduced anxiety-based behaviours) and the parents (e.g., increased respite and wellbeing). However, parents also reported challenges of dog ownership (e.g., adjustment to routines and barriers associated with the development of the human-dog relationship). These challenges appeared to be mitigated by tailored guidance and support from the Family Dog Service. The findings indicate that companion dog ownership provided benefits to children with ASC and their families, similar to those reported for autism assistance dogs. While the findings do not suggest that companion dogs can replace the important role played by specialist trained assistance dogs, it is possible that reported benefits may occur due to the development of the human-dog relationship, facilitated by the support offered by the Family Dog Service. The service may provide a practical, valuable alternative in light of restrictions and challenges often associated with securing assistance dog placements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.