ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Crucial Role of the Eyes in Predicting Facial Attractiveness from Parts.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laser-ablated gold nanoparticles: a novel approach to antimicrobial artificial eyes.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Botulinum Toxin Treatment Can Enlarge Eye Appearance in Asian Patients and Improves Social and Emotional Attributes.Toxins · 2026Article
- Unveiling the "Less is More" paradox: How experience and cognitive filling drive attractiveness in occluded faces.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceiving facial attractiveness based on partial information is a common experience in social interactions, where we often view only parts of faces. However, our understanding of predictions of the whole face from its parts remains limited. This study investigated this by dividing faces into the top and bottom halves (Study 1) and the forehead, eyes, nose, and mouth (Study 2). We compared how attractiveness was predicted from these parts versus when the whole face was fully observed. In the findings, overestimations occurred when predicting from the eyes (or the top half). Similarly, predictions from the nose resulted in overestimations, though to a lesser extent. In contrast, no difference was found between the predicted and observed attractiveness of the whole face when predicting from the mouth (or the bottom half). Further analysis revealed that the eyes were the most significant predictor of facial attractiveness across all facial features. Interestingly, higher attractiveness of the eyes was associated with a greater extent of overestimations in predictions from the eyes, whereas predictions from other parts exhibited a reduced extent of overestimations. These findings implied that predictions were influenced by the eyes, underscoring the critical role the eyes play in the process of predicting facial attractiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.