ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and Validation of a Rapid Tool to Measure Pragmatic Abilities: The Brief Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS Brief).
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Physical and Mental Metaphors (PMM) task and its validation in schizophrenia: A tool for rapid assessment of figurative language comprehension, between pragmatics and symptoms.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Enhancing Pragmatic Communication in Healthy Aging: A Preliminary Investigation of the Long-Term Effects of the Advanced Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026Article
- Figurative Archive: an open dataset and web-based application for the study of metaphor.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Ten years of using the APACS test: a multistudy cross-diagnostic analysis of pragmatic profiles and their relationship with Theory of Mind.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Assessing communicative-pragmatic ability in telehealth: e-ABaCo in autistic individuals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pragmatics is key to communicating effectively, and its assessment in vulnerable populations is of paramount importance. Although tools exist for this purpose, they are often effortful and time-consuming, with complex scoring procedures, which hampers their inclusion in clinical practice. To address these issues, we present the Brief Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS Brief), a rapid (10 min), easy-to-use and freely distributed tool for evaluating pragmatics in Italian, inspired by the existing APACS test and already validated in the remote version (APACS Brief Remote). The APACS Brief test measures-with a simplified scale-the domains of discourse production and figurative language understanding and is developed in two parallel forms, each including novel items differing from APACS. Psychometric properties, cut-off scores, and thresholds for change were computed on 287 adults. The analysis revealed satisfactory internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and strong concurrent and construct validity. Moreover, APACS Brief showed excellent discriminant validity on a sample of 56 patients with schizophrenia, who were also cross-classified consistently by APACS Brief and APACS cut-off values. Overall, APACS Brief is a reliable tool for evaluating pragmatic skills and their breakdown, with brief administration time and simple scoring making it well-suited for screening in at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.