Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001736›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mechanisms of Anxiety Among Doctoral Students in China.

Fan Bai, Feng Zhang, Yeqi Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fan BaiSchool of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Feng ZhangSchool of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Yeqi XueSchool of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anxiety of doctoral students in school has consistently been a major concern in society and the medical community, stemming from pressures, such as the pursuit of identity within highly professional and fiercely competitive academic communities, the urgent drive for high-level original scientific research output, and the need to break through the limits of personal ability to complete in-depth academic training. Current research has focused on the prevalence of, causes of, and intervention strategies for anxiety among doctoral students, but it still exhibits deficiencies, such as overly generalized analytical methods, neglect of the diversity within the doctoral student population, and the incomplete theoretical framework for the mechanisms of influence. Therefore, our study aims to examine the anxiety status of different categories of doctoral students and to explore their anxiety intervention mechanisms. Specifically, we employ a mixed research method combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to address issues, such as the influencing factors of anxiety in different types of doctoral students, the mechanisms of action of each factor, and the formation of an influence mechanism framework. The results indicate that anxiety is prevalent among doctoral students, with the key influencing factors being gender, age, love and marriage pressure, and self-perception. Full-time and part-time doctoral students exhibit different anxiety states and causes on account of varying pressures related to graduation, employment, and family factors. Our research distinguishes the heterogeneity of anxiety among different types of doctoral students in China, innovatively constructing a set of anxiety intervention mechanisms for doctoral students. It aims to provide policy insights for the adjustment of their anxiety and hopes to offer novel perspectives and exemplary references for the theoretical research and practical exploration of doctoral students' anxiety in other countries around the world.

Indexed as

anxietyformation mechanismsfull-timein-school doctoral studentspart-time

Identifiers

PMID40001736
PMCPMC11851512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.