ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Challenges and Opportunities in Cytopathology Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Unified Deep Learning Framework for Instance Segmentation Across Diverse Cytological Stains.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2026Article
- Pathology Foundation Models: Evolution, Current Landscape, Challenges and Opportunities from a Technical and Clinical Perspective.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning and object detection methods for scoring cell types within the human buccal cell micronucleus and cytome assays for human biomonitoring.Mutagenesis · 2026Review
- Cytopathology 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Cytopathology.Journal of cytologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize cytopathology by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility. However, the implementation of AI in this field presents significant challenges and opportunities. This review paper explores the current landscape of AI applications in cytopathology, highlighting the critical challenges, including data quality and availability, algorithm development, integration and standardization, and clinical validation. We discuss challenges such as the limitation of only one optical section and z-stack scanning, the complexities associated with acquiring high-quality labeled data, the intricacies of developing robust and generalizable AI models, and the difficulties in integrating AI tools into existing laboratory workflows. The review also identifies substantial opportunities that AI brings to cytopathology. These include the potential for improved diagnostic accuracy through enhanced detection capabilities and consistent, reproducible results, which can reduce observer variability. AI-driven automation of routine tasks can significantly increase efficiency, allowing cytopathologists to focus on more complex analyses. Furthermore, AI can serve as a valuable educational tool, augmenting the training of cytopathologists and facilitating global health initiatives by making high-quality diagnostics accessible in resource-limited settings. The review underscores the importance of addressing these challenges to harness the full potential of AI in cytopathology, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.