ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimization of Tibial Stem Geometry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Design of Experiments: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite Element Analysis and Computational Framework for Optimizing Laser Surface Modified Ti-6Al-4V Femoral Components in Total Knee Replacement.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Does tibial sclerosis severity influence bone resorption risk following total knee arthroplasty? : finite element analysis considering implant design and surgical technique.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Effect of tibial tray backside design on stress transfer and micromotion in uncemented posterior-stabilized TKA: A finite element study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Optimising tibial extension stem selection in total knee arthroplasty: the role of digital modelling.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Sensor-integrated hip and knee prostheses: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stability of the tibial component in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is critical to preventing aseptic loosening, a major cause of implant failure. However, existing tibial stem designs often lead to stress shielding and bone resorption, highlighting the need for further optimization. This study addresses these challenges by employing the Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology, specifically utilizing a full factorial design approach combined with finite element analysis (FEA), to optimize the geometry of the tibial stem. The material properties of the cortical and cancellous bone, as well as the tibial tray, were assigned based on values from the literature, representing their elastic moduli and Poisson's ratios. For boundary conditions, the distal end of the tibia was fully constrained to simulate realistic load transfer, while compressive loads representative of walking and daily activities were applied to the tibial base. Key design parameters, including stem diameter, length, mediolateral ratio (M/L ratio), and wing angle, were systematically analyzed. The results identified stem diameter and length as the most influential factors in improving biomechanical performance, while the wing angle showed minimal impact. The optimized design, featuring a stem diameter of 12 mm, length of 40 mm, M/L ratio of 0.61, and a wing angle of 60°, demonstrated significant reductions in stress shielding and aseptic loosening compared to conventional models. These findings provide valuable insights into enhancing the long-term success of TKA implants by balancing implant stability and minimizing bone resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.