Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001686›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Automated Extraction of Key Entities from Non-English Mammography Reports Using Named Entity Recognition with Prompt Engineering.

Zafer Akcali, Hazal Selvi Cubuk, Arzu Oguz, Murat Kocak, Aydan Farzaliyeva, Fatih Guven, Mehmet Nezir Ramazanoglu, Efe Hasdemir, Ozden Altundag, Ahmet Muhtesem Agildere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zafer AkcaliDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-4431
Hazal Selvi CubukDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-4233
Arzu OguzDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-6534
Murat KocakDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-3666
Aydan FarzaliyevaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.
Fatih GuvenDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.
Mehmet Nezir RamazanogluDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0007-4976-182X
Efe HasdemirDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.
Ozden AltundagDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.
Ahmet Muhtesem AgildereDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06790, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNamed entity recognition (NER) offers a powerful method for automatically extracting key clinical information from text, but current models often lack sufficient support for non-English languages. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study investigated a prompt-based NER approach using Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, a large language model (LLM) with a 1.5-million-token context window. We focused on extracting important clinical entities from Turkish mammography reports, a language with limited available natural language processing (NLP) tools. Our method employed many-shot learning, incorporating 165 examples within a 26,000-token prompt derived from 75 initial reports. We tested the model on a separate set of 85 unannotated reports, concentrating on five key entities: anatomy (ANAT), impression (IMP), observation presence (OBS-P), absence (OBS-A), and uncertainty (OBS-U).

resultsOur approach achieved high accuracy, with a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.99 for relaxed match and 0.84 for exact match. In relaxed matching, the model achieved F1 scores of 0.99 for ANAT, 0.99 for IMP, 1.00 for OBS-P, 1.00 for OBS-A, and 0.99 for OBS-U. For exact match, the F1 scores were 0.88 for ANAT, 0.79 for IMP, 0.78 for OBS-P, 0.94 for OBS-A, and 0.82 for OBS-U. DISCUSSION: These results indicate that a many-shot prompt engineering approach with large language models provides an effective way to automate clinical information extraction for languages where NLP resources are less developed, and as reported in the literature, generally outperforms zero-shot, five-shot, and other few-shot methods.

conclusionThis approach has the potential to significantly improve clinical workflows and research efforts in multilingual healthcare environments.

Indexed as

clinicomicsmachine learningmammographynamed entity recognition (NER)natural language processing (NLP)prompt engineeringradiology reports

Identifiers

PMID40001686
PMCPMC11852152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.