ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Autism Data Classification Using AI Algorithms with Rules: Focused Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early autism detection: a review of emerging technologies, biomarkers, and explainable AI approaches.Molecular brain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents challenges in early screening due to its varied nature and sophisticated early signs. From a machine-learning (ML) perspective, the primary challenges include the need for large, diverse datasets, managing the variability in ASD symptoms, providing easy-to-understand models, and ensuring ASD predictive models that can be employed across different populations. Interpretable or explainable classification algorithms, like rule-based or decision tree, play a crucial role in dealing with some of these issues by offering classification models that can be exploited by clinicians. These models offer transparency in decision-making, allowing clinicians to understand reasons behind diagnostic decisions, which is critical for trust and adoption in medical settings. In addition, interpretable classification algorithms facilitate the identification of important behavioural features and patterns associated with ASD, enabling more accurate and explainable diagnoses. However, there is a scarcity of review papers focusing on interpretable classifiers for ASD detection from a behavioural perspective. Thereby this research aimed to conduct a recent review on rule-based classification research works in order to provide added value by consolidating current research, identifying gaps, and guiding future studies. Our research would enhance the understanding of these techniques, based on data used to generate models and obtain performance by trying to highlight early detection and intervention ways for ASD. Integrating advanced AI methods like deep learning with rule-based classifiers can improve model interpretability, exploration, and accuracy in ASD-detection applications. While this hybrid approach has feature selection relevant features that can be detected in an efficient manner, rule-based classifiers can provide clinicians with transparent explanations for model decisions. This hybrid approach is critical in clinical applications like ASD, where model content is as crucial as achieving high classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.